Skip to main content

The More You Have, The More You Lose

Creatix / October 10, 2025


When markets lurch lower, the paradox of wealth shows up in neon: the more you have, the more you stand to lose. A 2.7% market drop may sound modest, but across the U.S. equity universe it translated into roughly $1.8 trillion in paper value erased today. Easy Comes, Easy Goes.

  • Today’s move: S&P 500 −2.7%, Nasdaq −3.6%, Dow −1.9%. (AP News)

  • Scale of loss: With the total U.S. market around $67T recently, a −2.7% swing ≈ $1.8T. (MacroMicro)


1) Wealth’s Volatility Tax

Wealth compounds upside, but it also amplifies downside. A 2.7% dip on $10,000 is lunch money; on $10 billion, it’s an empire’s quarterly R&D budget. This is the volatility tax on affluence: identical percentages, wildly different dollar amounts. That’s why drawdowns feel existential to the already-successful—because their “losses” are measured in hospitals not built, films not financed, labs not funded.


2) “Easy Comes, Easy Goes” (and Why the Rich Spend)

In the past year, upper-income households have driven an outsized share of U.S. consumption. Recent data show the top 10% of earners accounting for about half of all consumer outlays, a share that has ticked higher. (Bloomberg)

Why spend so freely? Because experienced investors know how quickly mark-to-market wealth can evaporate. Paper fortunes balloon in bull phases and shrink in selloffs; some owners burn a little cash while they can—on experiences, hard assets, philanthropy—partly to convert fragile paper gains into real life before the cycle turns. That isn’t carelessness; it’s risk management of a different kind: bank some utility now because tomorrow’s quotes are unknowable.


3) Loss Aversion vs. Investor Mindset

Behavioral finance calls it loss aversion: losses loom larger than gains—psychologically about twice as powerful. (Behavioral Economics)

  • Non-investors often hate markets for this very reason. The pain of seeing $100 become $97 overwhelms the memory of $97 becoming $100 yesterday.

  • Investors accept the rule: the more you have, the more you lose—in dollars—during squalls. They structure life so that percent swings don’t sink the ship: appropriate risk, ample liquidity, multi-year horizons. In both high tide and low tide, they float at the same waterline because their ballast (diversification, cash buffers, human capital) is set for storms, not just sunshine.


4) After the Poverty Line: Everything Is Relative

Below subsistence, a drawdown is catastrophic. But once you’re above basic security, most financial changes become relative: a nicer car deferred, not rent unpaid; a smaller bonus, not groceries missed. The philosophical move is to recalibrate reference points: measure wealth by resilience and optionality, not by the ticker.

Practical corollaries

  • Optimize for staying power (cash runway, low fixed costs) over bravado.

  • Treat percentages as your real P&L; treat dollars as context.

  • Convert paper to purpose: invest in skills, relationships, and health—assets that don’t gap down at the open.


5) A Short Guide to Sanity on −2.7% Days

  1. Name the beast: “This is volatility, not verdict.”

  2. Zoom the lens: Check rolling 3–5-year returns, not today’s candle.

  3. Pre-commit: Rebalancing rules beat reactive tinkering.

  4. Harden the floor: Emergency fund, laddered maturities, diversified income streams.

  5. Spend intentionally: If you’re going to “burn” some gains, do it on things that raise long-term wellbeing, not just status.


6) Philosophy: Wealth as Buoyancy, Not Bulk

  • Stoic frame: Prefer control (virtue, prudence) over contingency (quotes, cycles).

  • Entropy frame: Markets are noisy thermodynamic systems; design a portfolio as a low-entropy habit, not a high-precision prediction.

  • Purpose frame: Let goals set your risk, not FOMO. If the mission endures, drawdowns are price paid, not penalty incurred.

Conclusion:
Today’s −2.7% felt heavy because percentages are equal, but dollars aren’t. That’s the bargain of prosperity. Accept it. Build ballast. And remember: Easy Comes, Easy Goes—yet those who convert easy gains into durable capacities keep floating, tide after tide.


Today’s market context

For reference on the day’s move: AP recap, FT wrap, and Investopedia market brief. (AP News)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When will the Tesla bubble burst?

December 11, 2024 When will the Tesla bubble burst?  We don't know Fools rush in. It's impossible to know exactly when the Tesla bubble will finally burst. Unfortunately for us at Creatix, we began shorting Tesla too soon. We are down almost 40% on our position as of today. We are not fooling ourselves thinking that we were ever make money on the short position. We truly doubt that Tesla can go down 40% any time soon.  We would love to add to the short position, but it would exceed our $3,000 limit on the stupid bets that we do for fun. We're not Mr. Beast. We have a very limited budget for ridiculousness. We would love to short Tesla tomorrow morning at the ridiculous share price of $424. Tesla is trading at an incredible 116 times earnings, which gives Tesla a market capitalization of $1.32 Trillion. Elon Musk added today $13.4 billion to his fortune. Yes, $13 billion in one day. Yesterday, he had added $11 billion. Yes, that's $24 billion in 2 days.  Six months ago, ...

Will Tariffs Reduce the National Debt?

Creatix / June 30, 2025 The U.S. national debt has surpassed $34.7 trillion , and the cost of servicing that debt— just the interest payments—has soared to over $1 trillion annually as of mid-2025. This marks a historic shift: we now spend more just paying interest on the National debt than on defense, Medicare, or any single discretionary program. Economists warn that unless fiscal policy changes, interest costs will crowd out critical investments in infrastructure, education, and innovation, deepening the structural debt burden for future generations. From Osama to MAGA OBBA: the path to U.S. bankruptcy. Osama Bin Laden "succeeded" in putting us in a path to bankruptcy. The U.S. national debt began to increase dramatically after 9/11, marking a sharp departure from the budget surpluses of the late 1990s. In response to the terrorist attacks, the U.S. launched costly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, while also implementing sweeping tax cuts under the Bush administration. These...

How TikTok can Artificially Spread Socialism in America?

Creatix / June 29, 2025 TikTok's Socialist Movement in New York City  In one of the most unexpected political turns in recent New York history, Zohran Mamdani , the democratic socialist Assemblymember from Queens, has defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor. While the general election remains to be decided in November of this year, Mamdani is now the clear frontrunner. His socialist victory signals not just a generational shift, but the rise of a new kind of political power: one fueled by TikTok , a Chinese-owned social media platform that has become Gen Z’s ideological training ground. From Astoria to Citywide Dominance Mamdani first rose to prominence as a bold and principled advocate for tenants’ rights, public transportation reform, and wealth redistribution in the State Assembly. But his stunning mayoral primary win wasn’t just about policy—it was about algorithmic delivery powered by Chinese media company. Mamdani didn’t r...